Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(ci): pin the golang lint version #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

fix(ci): pin the golang lint version #178

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 commented Sep 2, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

There are some major changes in 1.60.3, the current latest version which break our CI. To avoid them, we pin the version.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the linting configuration to use a fixed version of the golangci-lint tool, enhancing consistency and reliability in linting results.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The configuration for the golangci-lint action in the GitHub Actions workflow file has been updated to specify a fixed version, changing from latest to "v1.59.1". This change aims to ensure consistent linting results and mitigate potential issues associated with using the most recent version of the tool.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml Changed version: latest to version: "v1.59.1"

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant golangci-lint

    Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push code
    GitHub Actions->>golangci-lint: Run linting with version "v1.59.1"
    golangci-lint-->>GitHub Actions: Return lint results
    GitHub Actions-->>Developer: Display lint results
Loading

Poem

In the meadow where I hop and play,
A change was made to brighten the day.
A version fixed, no more surprise,
Linting's now clear, oh how it flies!
With every line, we dance and cheer,
Consistency’s here, let’s give a cheer! 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a59729 and e615dbf.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

40-40: LGTM!

Pinning the version of the golangci-lint tool to v1.59.1 is a good practice to ensure consistent linting results and avoid potential issues with the latest version. This change aligns with the PR objectives and should help maintain stability in the CI workflow.

bwhour
bwhour approved these changes Sep 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@bwhour bwhour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L.G.

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 merged commit 2b313c4 into ExocoreNetwork:develop Sep 2, 2024
18 checks passed
trestinlsd pushed a commit to trestinlsd/exocore that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
@MaxMustermann2 @trestinlsd
fix(ci): pin the golang lint version (ExocoreNetwork#178)
8a1717d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@TimmyExogenous TimmyExogenous TimmyExogenous approved these changes

@trestinlsd trestinlsd trestinlsd approved these changes

@bwhour bwhour bwhour approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Type: CI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@MaxMustermann2 @bwhour @trestinlsd @TimmyExogenous